What Odisha Gets Right
For a state that gets most of its press coverage during disasters, there are things it is doing better than the narrative suggests.
Founder, Majhi Group & Majhi OS
The external narrative about Odisha concentrates on what it lacks: development metrics below its resource endowment, talent that leaves for other cities, industries that haven't diversified fast enough. I grew up inside that narrative. I also grew up watching the state do things quietly well that the narrative doesn't capture.
There are things Odisha gets right that are worth naming, both because they are genuinely instructive and because the deficit framing that dominates the state's external representation is not the complete picture.
Disaster preparedness
The most remarkable thing about Odisha is the cyclone response system.
In 1999, a super cyclone killed approximately 10,000 people in the state. The response capacity was inadequate, evacuation was slow, communication failed, the death toll reflected institutional unpreparedness as much as the severity of the storm.
In the decades since, the state built one of the most effective disaster preparedness systems in India. Early warning systems, pre-positioned relief, trained response teams, a system of cyclone shelters along the coast that can house hundreds of thousands of people. The process was not smooth, it required sustained investment, institutional capacity-building, and the kind of boring infrastructure work that rarely gets political credit.
The results have been extraordinary. Cyclone Fani in 2019, which was among the most powerful tropical cyclones to make landfall in decades, struck a coastline where 1.2 million people had been evacuated in the 48 hours prior to landfall. The death toll was 64, a tragedy, but a transformed one from what 1999 showed was possible without preparation. In a parallel universe without the investment in preparedness, Fani kills thousands.
This is governance that works. It does not make headlines the way failures do. But it is exactly the kind of patient institution-building that produces the outcomes that matter.
Fiscal management
Odisha has been among the better-performing Indian states on fiscal management over the past two decades.
The state moved from a fiscal deficit of over 4% of GSDP in the early 2000s, among the most stressed in India, to sustained FRBM (Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management) compliance by the early 2010s. By the late 2010s, Odisha had become one of the few Indian states running a revenue surplus, with the ability to invest in development without being constrained by inherited debt service. The RBI's State of State Finances reports have consistently highlighted Odisha as among the more fiscally disciplined state governments.
This discipline is not exciting. It does not produce the kind of visible announcements that political cycles tend to favour. But it created space for infrastructure and social investment that states carrying heavier debt loads cannot make.
Sports infrastructure
Odisha has made a quiet bet on sports that deserves more attention than it has received.
The Kalinga Stadium in Bhubaneswar has hosted the Hockey World Cup twice, 2018 and 2023, along with major athletics events and international football matches. The state government made an early and deliberate commitment to building sports infrastructure at a quality level that few Indian states have matched. Hockey, in particular, has become an Odisha export: the state sponsors the Indian Men's Hockey Team, funding uniforms, logistics, and support infrastructure nationally while building grassroots programs at home.
This is an unusual form of soft power, using sports to build an identity and attract events that generate economic activity, visibility, and pride that outlasts any single tournament. The bet is long-term and not obviously connected to the more immediate development priorities. Which is precisely why it works. It signals something about institutional vision that is different from the visible, urgent investments.
Odisha has hosted two Hockey World Cups at Kalinga Stadium and become the official sponsor of the Indian Men's Hockey Team. No other state has made this bet. It says something about institutional vision.
What this points toward
The things Odisha gets right tend to share a characteristic: they required sustained investment in unglamorous systems, with returns that materialized slowly and often non-visibly.
The cyclone preparedness system was not built in one budget cycle. It required fifteen years of sustained attention. The fiscal position was not achieved through a dramatic intervention; it was the cumulative result of consistent decisions across multiple administrations.
This is the model for what needs to happen in the domains where the state is still underperforming. Education quality will not improve through one program; it will improve through sustained investment in teacher capacity, curriculum improvement, and accountability systems over a decade. The coastal tourism potential will not be realized through one resort development; it will be realized through sustained investment in the infrastructure and quality-of-experience that makes destinations sustainable.
The template exists. The cyclone story is evidence that Odisha can execute this kind of sustained, patient institution-building when it decides to. The question is whether the same commitment transfers to the domains where the gaps are still large.
Cyclone Fani struck a coastline where 1.2 million people had been evacuated in 48 hours. The death toll was 64. This is governance that works - and it does not make headlines the way failures do.
See also: Beyond GDP: What a Developed Odisha Must Be Answerable For, Odisha Economy: Current State and Trajectory, Odisha Infrastructure: The Foundation Being Built
Sources
UNDP: Odisha Disaster Risk Reduction: Case Study in Community-Based Preparedness
National Disaster Management Authority: Cyclone Fani: Lessons and Response Analysis
Reserve Bank of India: State of State Finances: Fiscal Discipline Rankings
Odisha Hockey: Government of Odisha Sports Sponsorship Programme
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Odisha cyclone preparedness story and why is it significant as governance evidence?
In 1999, a super cyclone killed approximately 10,000 people in Odisha. The institutional unpreparedness, slow evacuation, communication failure, inadequate response capacity, was as responsible for the death toll as the storm's severity. In the following decades, the state built one of India's most effective disaster preparedness systems: early warning infrastructure, pre-positioned relief, trained response teams, and a coastal network of cyclone shelters capable of housing hundreds of thousands. Cyclone Fani in 2019, among the most powerful tropical cyclones to make landfall anywhere in decades, struck a coastline where 1.2 million people had been evacuated in the 48 hours prior to landfall. The death toll was 64. This is not just an improvement. It is institutional capability that went from complete failure to world-class performance in under two decades, through sustained investment in unglamorous infrastructure with no immediate political payoff.
What does Odisha's fiscal management record show about the state's governance capacity?
Odisha moved from significant debt levels in the early 2000s, levels that constrained development investment, to becoming one of the few Indian states with meaningful fiscal headroom by the late 2010s. This came through a combination of revenue improvements, expenditure discipline, and Finance Commission transfers, none of which individually dramatic, all of which requiring consistent choices across multiple administrations. States that carry heavy inherited debt service cannot make the infrastructure and social investments that Odisha's improved fiscal position enabled. The discipline didn't produce visible announcements or political headlines. It produced space. The pattern of unglamorous sustained investment with slow, non-visible returns, the same pattern that produced the cyclone system, is visible here too.
What does the pattern of things Odisha gets right suggest for areas where it still underperforms?
The cyclone preparedness system required fifteen years of sustained attention. The fiscal discipline required consistent decisions across multiple administrations. What they share is patient institution-building with returns that materialized slowly. The domains where Odisha is still underperforming, education quality, rural infrastructure, tourism visitor experience, private sector employment density, are not different in kind from the problems the cyclone system solved. They require the same sustained investment in unglamorous systems. The template exists. The cyclone story is evidence that Odisha can execute this kind of sustained, patient institution-building when it commits to it. The open question is whether the same commitment transfers to development challenges that don't have the political urgency that mass-casualty events produce.
Did this land? Push back? Add something I missed?
Reply to Manas →Continue Reading
Related writing
Salt, Steel, and Silicon
Three ages. Three resources. One coast, one mountain range, one generation. Odisha has had what the world needed every time the world changed what it needed. The first two ages were defined by what the land contained. The third will be defined by what the people decide.
Agriculture Beyond Subsidies
Odisha has subsidized its farmers for three decades. Farm incomes remain among the lowest in India. The problem was never a lack of support, it was the wrong kind of support. Subsidies preserve the status quo. Infrastructure changes it.
Water as Odisha's Strategic Asset
Odisha has more river systems, more rainfall, and more coastline than most Indian states. It also floods regularly, irrigates less farmland than the national average, and watched Chhattisgarh build upstream dams on its primary river while it was still deciding what to do about it. This is not a geography problem.